• @MaxMouseOCX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    I just read an article about a browser… That somehow included a court case about hulk hogan being gay or not… I had to stop right there lol.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    I hadn’t read the details of their intended ad network. I just recall it sounded shady. Now that I read about it, it sounds very similar conceptually to Google’s Privacy Sandbox. I’m not sure if this is a better or worse approach than the status quo but I surely don’t trust Brave Inc, a startup with a questionable business model and investors, with gathering and processing this data.

    • @Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Stop doing that specific thing. You’ll live.

      (Or just use Ungoogled Chromium for the time being, until you learn to stop doing what you’re doing.)

  • @Carter@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -72 years ago

    Ignoring all other concerns, Brave is simply the buggiest browser I’ve ever used, both on desktop and mobile. It’s the only one where I have to regularly switch to a different browser due to sites not loading properly.

  • dream_weasel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    Anyone here ragging on brave that is on a Windows platform has got a real funky view of privacy. By percentage, that is probably most.

  • @rog@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1442 years ago

    I dont know why anyone would leave chrome and land on something like brave.

    If youre ditching chrome, which you should, go to an actual different browser and use Firefox.

    • @whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I was using Chrome as a secondary because unfortunately “designed for Chrome” is a thing now, and got sick of Google’s bullshit and thought I was doing better by going to Brave. Unfortunately, it quickly became clear that Brave has its own large ethical holes.

    • @FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -92 years ago

      Firefox and gecko are just not as smooth. I don’t know how you don’t notice this, especially on Android.

    • @hayes_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      572 years ago

      Personal anecdote:

      When I initially decided to drop Chrome, I moved to Brave because - as a chromium-based browser - it supported the same set of extensions I’d grown accustomed to.

      That being said, the crypto stuff weirded me out enough that, once I’d weaned myself off the extensions, I switched to Firefox.

      • @Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        What extensions does chrome have which are useful that Firefox doesn’t?

        My only recurring issue with Firefox, which may have been fixed I dunno, is it for some reason it “isn’t officially supported” or whatever exact wording to use hardware security keys (like yubikey, which I use on every account that allows it). It’s only certain websites that don’t want to work though. Like google, Microsoft and many others were fine but I think paypal didn’t want to work properly but it does work on Edge, Chrome, probably Brave. Overall annoying as fuck at times but I deal with it to be out of Google’s-world

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Chromium has metric shit tons of work done that seems to perform great. What I would love to see is for Mozilla to fork Chromium, staff it with enough people to maintain it, add/remove the features they feel are appropriate/inappropriate, and thus reuse the tons of free work Google and others have already done. As a software engineer, I don’t buy the argument that it’s easier to correctly implement every new web feature anew than maintaining a fork. Every large org that ships anything based on Android for example maintains a fork of an even bigger codebase. It’s not as complicated as people make it out to be. It’s not a new problem and there are strategies to manage it. If Mozilla does this, they’ll be able to play an active role in steering by far the biggest rendering engine’s direction, instead of playing opposition with no stake in it. Now downvote away! 😄

      • tate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        The more market share chrome based browsers have, the easier it is for google to inflict their agenda for the internet on everyone. If firefox didnt exist, every web developer would be optimizing their sites only for chrome, and responding quickly to any change google wants to make.

        • Avid Amoeba
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It really doesn’t matter what Firefox’es codebase is though. To a web developer it’s a black box. It may as well be COBOL. So long as enough people use it and it behaves differently to a web developer than Google’s Chromium or Chrome, the goal you mentioned is achieved. This is why I don’t buy this argument.

    • @mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I am using Brave mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

    • @Cypher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Streaming services seem to lower bitrate when I’m using Firefox vs Brave, so Brave is my go to for streaming.

      I use Firefox for everything else.

    • @exonac@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -32 years ago

      Brave is the only browser I know that can play youtube videos in the background on mobile. Please tell me another browser that can do that. The UX is just really good.

    • @chris2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’ve tried Firefox several times but always end up back on chromium due to compatibility; a lot of sites don’t play well with anything but chrome anymore and this is very much something intentionally caused by Google, who have basically taken a page out of Microsoft’s playbook but with a much more mature product that is going to be substantially harder to replace then IE was

    • Anaralah_Belore223
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Also, if you going to completely ditch chrome/chromium, also stop using Electron apps (which have chromium/Chromium Embedded Framework on them!)

  • @mandolrain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 years ago

    I really enjoy brave on desktop and mobile. Other mobile browsers turn every internet interaction into chaos with all the popups and ads (even let’s you use YouTube in the background with its playlist feature on mobile). I read the article and I didn’t understand why the product itself was bad? CEO did some stuff that the writer (and me) doesn’t agree with, doesn’t make it a crappy product though?

  • @Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    I use brave to keep a secret set of tabs so my wife won’t see my jerk off material on chrome.

    Pretty useful for that actually