• Cool Beance
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    A Toyota Pixis Mega/Honda N Van as a daily and a toy on the side, that’s ideal for me and maybe it should be for Americans too. But I’m biased because I love driving

  • Bloops
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Fuck it, it’s Wuling Hongguang Mini EV posting hours

  • @Nisciunu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    642 years ago

    Whenever I’m in the States I hate the fact that everything is a 20 minute car ride away. I understand why road rage can be a thing if you spend so much time in the car.

      • @BilboBallbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I agree and disagree with this. I don’t think the US inherently must be car centric because it’s big. But I do agree that Europe has superior pedestrian infrastructure because it developed for most of its history without cars. Auto and oil industry lobbying has instigated the situation in the US, but their agenda was only achievable because the technology existed to make large scale changes to the terrain, mass produce vehicles, etc. It’s very likely that there were people throughout Europe’s history who tried to monopolize bridges or horse wagons or other forms of transport, but the technology wasn’t sufficient for it to materialize. Warsaw was destroyed during WWII and rebuilt, and it’s developed to be very car-centric compared to other cities in Poland and Europe.

      • @NuanceDemon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 years ago

        Unfortunately it’s zoning that caused most of this issue. Not size. Dense residential was disallowed for not entirely un-racist reasons, so it spread out enormously instead. On top of car companies lobbying in various ways to make cars essential.

      • @Nisciunu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        I totally get that fact. I also think that it would not be bad to copy some things from other countries to make the cities in the States more liveable without car dependency. There’s enough space to do that.

        • @SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          At the very least we could link cities with rail systems. Don’t put a million stops on them either though. Try taking Amtrack from DC to Boston and you’ll see what I mean.

          • @orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            just have more than one set of tracks and you can have a regional and express service train!

          • @Sax_Offender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Passenger trains exist in the U.S. They used to be popular. Then planes and affordable automobiles put them out of business. If you don’t live in a dense urban area, you almost certainly have a car, meaning you aren’t beholden to train schedules and destinations. If you are in an area where you get by without a car, an Uber to the airport gets you to your destination much faster.

      • @scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 years ago

        If anything this means Europe’s cities just can’t accommodate cars, because they weren’t built for them. The weird thing is that American cities were built for cars and yet still can’t accommodate cars. Traffic, lack of parking, road rage… it’s a huge mess, and it seems like the more you commit to cars, the worse it all gets. That’s the trouble with cars. They just don’t work.

        I don’t really understand this comment though. It doesn’t take thousands of years to achieve urban density. And what does America’s sprawl have to do with loving large cars? You don’t need a huge car to drive medium distances.

        • @SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 years ago

          You need density to support a train system. You need a large number of riders to make it economical and you need them living within a reasonable distance of the stations. The US is very spread out. You can blame cars for that but that is the world we live in. The US is also very big with large rural areas, the western US didn’t even really develop until trains came out in the 1869. Europe was built around compact cities based on horses and walking long before cars.

          I agree that we are too car focused and it has become a sort of arms race, build more roads, more cars, more roads, etc.

          • @coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            The focus on cars is emotionally driven. The car symbolizes freedom and independence. Besides this it’s a huge status symbol. And the industry is working hard to keep it this way. The lack of decent public transportation is by design.

          • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            the western US didn’t even really develop until trains came out in the 1869

            The western US didn’t really develop until the government started giving land that had already been ceded to indigenous peoples and couldn’t actually support dense settlement to white settlers, at the behest of railroad companies who needed an artificial reason to build railroads in the first place.

          • @zephyreks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -82 years ago

            Vancouver runs trains through SFH development. Montreal does too. Hell, so does London.

            You’re an untravelled idiot and it shows.

          • Silver Golden
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            America exists because of the train, which it has since abandoned

  • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So I live in the cousin-fuckingly-deep south where 90% of what’s on the road is trying its best to be a monster truck… I drive what looks like a pregnant rollerskate by comparison cuz I don’t want to send half my paycheck into the gas tank.

    It’s funny-sad how the folks in the giant trucks get offended just by seeing my tiny car. Every day there’s always at least one asshole in an F-350 or some shit that likes to ride up on my ass cuz I guess it makes them feel powerful? I just drop a mph every couple seconds until either they fuck off or get annoyed enough to pass.

    Anyway, moral of the story is that stupid-big vehicles are here to stay in the US, at least in the regions occupied by Y’all Quaeda. Their trucks are one of their few sources of self esteem.

    …I’m really tempted to find one of those rubber testicle things that the cowboys like to put between the rear wheels of their trucks, but like a comically tiny one, color it like the trans flag, and hang it on the back of my tiny car just to annoy the rednecks on the road. …although here, that’d probably get my car or myself shot.

  • KrisND
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -52 years ago

    I’ll continue to pay extra for a large truck. Handling, strength, towing, hauling. I’m positive I’ll get mostly downvotes but it doesn’t make a difference, I’ll still be driving my truck dozens of miles commuting every day! 9-12 MPG, pure diesel baby!

    • Handling & Enjoyment: I enjoy having something bigger, it handles great.
    • Strength: It’s not gonna total out going thru a fence or hitting a deer. (Confirmed)
    • Towing, Hauling/Payload: No rentals needed. Summer time fun with the boat, coolers, off roading, camping and so forth. Helpful to friends, saves them a buck. Great for work too. Oh and saving all the smaller cars who got stuck in the winter time, literally saving lives.
  • @LongPigFlavor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I drive a 2015 Chevy Spark, the gas version. The ev version was discontinued in 2016, the gas version was discontinued in 2022. The Chevy Sonic, a similar, but slightly larger model was discontinued in 2020. The Chevy Bolt, an ev and larger, but still compact model and a successor to the Spark and Sonic was discontinued this year. It’s become apparent that most Americans do not like small cars. I don’t think much can be done to make small cars likable here, I’d love to be able to drive a car like the Honda E, but there’s no market for it here.

  • @orangebussycat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    It’s time for Americans to stop spending so much time in their cars. Emissions from burning hydrocarbons are destroying the planet.

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    662 years ago

    Normal sized cars* you mean.

    Normal cars aren’t small. They’re just small if you compare them to the giant ridiculous trucks they have over that.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    The main reason is manufacturers make more money off of larger cars. The cost of making cars doesn’t vary that much, but larger cars can be sold for much more, so the profit margin is greater. That, and costs for parts tend to be greater, also.

  • @alamante@partizle.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Ford F150/Chevy 1500 and bigger just keep getting bigger every style change. I call them pavement tanks.

  • @shashi154263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    Here we have higher taxes for cars more than 4m long, so there are lots of small cars. Also, a lot of 3.99m cars.

  • @coheedcollapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    There was a time back when gas prices got kinda high when I thought Americans would finally shift down to slightly smaller cars, but now it’s practically a cultural thing for half the country to burn as much fuel as possible, so I suspect even if gas prices here hit Europe levels it wouldn’t cause them to budge much.

    It does feel really odd, though, going somewhere like a school and just being absolutely surrounded by huge SUVs and pickup trucks that you know damn well like 90% of the drivers aren’t actually utilizing.

    Double-sucks because it’s becoming more and more difficult to find a small car. Everything new, even most cars, are huge.

  • @grayman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    CAFE is killing the smaller vehicle. Vehicles are getting super round and boring for aerodynamics. Wheel base is getting longer. Track is getting wider. There’s no such thing as a small truck. Everything is am SUV (“truck”) or crossover (hatchback / station wagon). CAFE allows for less fuel efficiency for wider track and longer wheelbase and trucks over everything else.

    Remember how VW got caught cheating on the mileage tests? Remember how every other major manufacturer was caught too?

    The govt has set far too high of a standard for mileage, so car companies are making giant ass cars to meet (cheat) CAFE standards. The manufacturers have done everything they can but still can’t meet the standards.