• TrackinDaKraken
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3213 days ago

        Prevents confusion between the four and the six: III, IV, V, VI, when the watch is not held perfectly vertically for viewing.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          18
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I’ve also heard that, because in Latin IV is the beginning of “IVPPITER” (Jupiter), there’s a theory that people avoided using “IV” as to not “disrespect” the god’s name. 🤷‍♀️

          Also, on a 12 hour clock, 3 sets of four looks clean af I guess, e.g.:

          • I, II, III, IIII
          • V, VI, VII, VIII
          • IX, X, XI, XII
          • @Merva@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Since the IIII usage is common in the Middle Ages and even into the Early Modern Period, when nobody believed in Jupiter, that is obviously just something somebody made up.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              It could have also started from that and continued on despite people not knowing the reason, no? I do agree that it’s quite silly and unlikely, though.

      • @bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        413 days ago

        Even the French figured out that decimalized time was stupid after a couple of years.

        Which has added credence to the old saying that “The French follow no one. And no one follows the French.”

          • @bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            012 days ago

            Well, beyond the sheer social resistance to the idea. Turns out everyone needs to agree it’s a great idea and almost no one did. Evidently humans are wired to the base12 time format far better.

            The attempt at switching to base10 time quickly fell apart when people started notice that the the “time markers” were starting to drift. And at some point they finally figured out that what we call “noon” was going drift rather quickly to not happening until evening and therefore Monday was going to move to a different spot also. This is a very bad thing. Because any kind of calendaring system needs to be as consistent as possible. Noon must happen at the same point in the day every day or as close to it as it it can mathematically get. If it drifts to fast and far, then it’s a worthless marker for time. And decimal time has that problem in spades.

            Now, no calendar system is perfect because the orbits of the planets in our solar system isn’t perfectly consistent. Sometimes the orbit of earth is a tiny bit faster or sometimes it’s a tiny bit slower. So we strive to get a close as we can but we still need to make adjustments. Turns out, all that math is really bloody hard.

            • @Corn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              ??? That’s not how it worked at all.

              They still had the same length of time per day; 24 hours was equal to 10 french hour, each french hour was 100 french minutes, and each french minute was 100 french seconds. So noon arrived at 5 every day.