You’re the one making rightwing, redpill assertions. Shut up about women and you won’t have this problem
Did your “self improving” consist of listening to pseudo-evolutionary pseudo-psychologists run their mouths?
Oh no, I refuse to shut up. You are no one to be able to do that, and I effectively seize that power from you. The one who made BS redpill assumptions about me simply saying I was working on self improving my personality during college days, is you. You wrote this, right?
I think I forgot to partially address the “about women” part. There is another parent comment on this post, where a woman gets to stereotype all men based on her men friends, but that is not misandrist for some bizarre reason. My comment however was similar in tone, not aggressive, and yet it got labelled as misogynistic. If women get to speak on behalf of all men, men also get to speak on behalf of all women. Let’s play fair and equal, since feminists claim to advocate for equality.
“Simply saying I was working on self improving” lmao
Wtf is that comment? Actually unhinged
Can you feel the self improvement?
As someone that’s done self improvement stuff (exercising, running calisthenics, healthier diet, letting stuff from the past go, mental introspection, etc) without the red pill chud nonsense, this guy’s comment is just not it. He still hasn’t let some girls “cock blocking” him go. What kind of self improvement is that? Clear issues with women here.
That chud is “self improving” the way his not-idol Jordan Peterson “studied communism for 25 years” before the Zizek debate.
“Men on the other hand are calm, which is why they calmly write whiny crybully misogynist shit like all of the above.”
Uhm yes, someone that trashes others for working on themselves is a trash person, ESPECIALLY when that person claims to be a feminist. Is feminism about equality, or an illogical, incoherent bias towards favouring women no matter what?
So, what did you telling this feminist about your self improvement look like? Did it involve saying anything about the supposed nature of men and/or women?
Because you’re doing that here, and “self-improvement” has become synonymous with evo-psych quackery like Jordan Peterson’s
Simply put, I was trying to become socially a good person for friends, to become socially favourable towards girls, since I was a whacko with borderline (not fully) redpill beliefs. I did, despite what this horrible person said to me, because of “toxic masculinity” aka not giving a F about her.
Does that sound like lobster boy’s 12 rules and other evangelist Christian preaching to you?
I was trying to become socially a good person for friends
And you failed.
to become socially favourable towards girls
And you failed.
since I was a whacko with borderline (not fully) redpill beliefs
Those never went away.
aka not giving a F about her
Your self-congratulatory apathy toward other people is self-defeating and the reason you continue to fail.
Does that sound like lobster boy’s 12 rules and other evangelist Christian preaching to you?
There is no functional difference. If you came up with that shit all by yourself you’re just working extra hard when that garbage is already there for the taking.
Thanks for judging me and my alleged personality failures, when you know nothing about me beyond what I type on internet. I am enlightened and will soon reach divinity by your holy life crippling blessings.
Thanks for judging me and my alleged personality failures
You are voluntarily continuing to sabotage your own well being with your ruinous beliefs. Passive-aggressive sarcastic statements don’t protect you from that and they even fail your own standards of “self improvement” unless sulking and pouting is part of your manliness regimen.
when you know nothing about me beyond what I type on internet
This isn’t 2003. The internet’s been around long enough for that 4chan lie about how the nazis on 4chan were only ironic nazis has ceased to be convincing. People more often than not are what they present themselves as on the internet and the mask of anonymity just makes people like you show us what you really are beneath offline social expectations.
I am enlightened and will soon reach divinity by your holy life crippling blessings.
Again, your passive-aggressive sarcastic sulking is not doing anything for you here.
I was trying to become socially a good person for friends, to become socially favourable towards girls
Those are one and the same thing. Women aren’t some other kind of beast that you have to learn about, they’re just people that you need to unlearn some distinctions about if you ever want to connect with them. Same goes for men.
When I hear another man talk about men being chimps when chasing women, I hear excuses for stereotypical and often violent behavior
When I say chimp behaviour, it only means unhinged, uncivilised and primitive behaviour with no moral or logical control over self. Basically put, how animals mate in the open. That allows no excuses in my book, the same way autism does not give someone a license to insult or harm others. Usually conservatives can use it as a phrase to cloak stereotypical behaviour, which is not exactly my intent.
Please, and I hesitate to use this phrase, touch grass.
men also get to speak on behalf of all women
I am a man. I will speak on behalf of men that are not you and tell you to fuck off.
You do not get to speak on behalf of all men either, if I do not. So, I prefer not listening if this is the message and the way you convey it. I am not functionally same as lobster boy or whoever else, and I find such arguments quite the cheapshot.
