You must log in or register to comment.
Not Canadian, contrary to my username. I’m actually Spanish, so I imagine that I’m the one who would be correct considering it’s my native language
Am I supposed to believe you’re not furniture either? Nice try you shifty stack of maple drawers.
Edit: ¿“Por” no es “for” en ingles?
¿Para qué no les dijiste cómo?
Prepositions are probably one of the parts of speech that is the hardest to translate in any language.
I learned Swedish as a second language, and it feels like “at”, “for”, and “on” are completely randomly interchanged, even though each word has a direct translation and both Swedish and English are Germanic languages at their core. There are multiple forms of “to” in Swedish too.
The “usage notes” section for the Swedish word for “On” is an experience lol
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/på#Usage_notesLuckily, they’re also the most forgiving part at any speech of mistranslate.
It’s no wonder doctors in linguistics dip into philosophy as often as they do, incredible minds to know enough languages to study them. Polyglots are cool
“Shifty stack of maple drawers” is this best thing I’ve read all week. Thank you for that.
You’re welcome thanks yourself
Por does mean for, but only in specific contexts. Here’s a list. It also can mean by, through, because of, and to, to name a few.
Isn’t it strange how languages have tons of homonyms we hardly notice while having synonyms for almost anything else? Thanks for sharing I’ll check that out.
