Pretty damning review.

  • kadu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    198
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “Billet review” is downplaying by an extreme degree.

    They reviewed a cooler prototype designed for one GPU using a different one and claimed the product was not worth a purchase for anybody, ever. Linus was aware of the issue, but said the cooler was bad “regardless of what the true results would’ve shown” and not worth “$500 of extra time reviewing it correctly”.

    Then, they took this internal prototype that the company lended for review and, after claiming to be ready to give it back two times, SOLD IT to a random third party during an event. An event where competitors from the original company were visiting.

    The company already confirmed that was their best prototype and they were relying on it to iterate on the design.

    So LTT accepted a lent prototype from a new company, absolutely trashed the product in a review they purposely published with wrong methodology, then stole the prototype and sold it to God knows who.

      • King
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -752 years ago

        Evil - least sheltered redditor, just an ass

        • @picassowary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          432 years ago

          ruining a prototype product, talking shit about it, and then selling it is a lot worse than being “just an ass”

          • King
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -872 years ago

            K hes hitler the evil twins

              • King
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -452 years ago

                Ad hominems, buddy projecting find an argument next time

                  • King
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -4
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    So?

                    Edit wait are you claiming redditor is an ad hominem? Do you think that migrating to lemmy from reddit for a month puts you so much higher above redditors that u perceive being called one as an attack directed against you??? LMFAOOOOOO

            • @picassowary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              192 years ago

              the dictionary definition of evil is “morally reprehensible”. you don’t need to overreact by going straight to a godwin

              • King
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -342 years ago

                So what we call hitler then

                • -V0lD
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  162 years ago

                  Pink and crimson are both red. But vastly different shades of it

                  • King
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -172 years ago

                    Deep, so both linus and Hitler are evil ?

    • urshanabi [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This is hard to believe, it seems too comical.

      I believe you of course, and without accumulating enough about Linus’ & LTT’s antics I would have doubted you. I wonder what it is that causes these kinds of things to happen. I want to say success but I think there may be something about their ethos. Not what they espouse but what they sorta believe internally.

    • @ElusiveClarity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      I don’t understand why he won’t just own up to the wrong gpu thing and move on. It’s like getting pissy that the f150 exhaust sounds like shit on your ford ranger.

    • @SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      302 years ago

      I think that their point that it’s an $800 product for a last-gen card, there really isn’t anyone out there that should buy this, and therefore it’s a bad product is valid. They could have handled the whole thing better and honestly should’ve just scrapped the video before release.

      Auctioning off the prototype when the company asked for it back is pretty inexcusable. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t malicious, but they clearly have problems with internal communication of things like this are happening.

      At any rate, it’s going to be a spicy WAN show this week. Linus needs to actually watch the video and address this point-by-point. If he “reads the comments” or cherry picks some of GN’s weaker arguments he’s just going to end up throwing fuel on the fire.

      • @nachom97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        I dont think it was malicious, but it is incredibly negligent. It puts a huge stain on the company that’s expected to honor embargos for unreleased products.

      • @Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 years ago

        Then they shouldn’t have reviewed it if their decision was made before even holding the product in their hand.

        They could have reviewed it from the point of view of an R&D curiosity with the potential future iterations and cost reductions as the new startup finds their feet. Because, you know, that’s what it was. But they decided to shit all over it for dishonest reasons instead.

      • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I feel that if LMG looked at this product and thought “hey this is really dogshit”, the decent thing to do would have been to go back to billet and tell them we can’t cover it at all (and cop the loss of few hours as part of running an ethical business)

      • @ghostinthessh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        302 years ago

        It’s pretty normal for water blocks to come out well after a GPUs release. Also it looks like it was a new product/company so it makes sense the design took longer than the competition.

    • @GravityAce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      852 years ago

      LTT should be getting the pants sued off of them for that kind of behavior. No way this whole cooler prototype thing was not nefarious.

      • Magnor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        442 years ago

        At the very least it appears incredibly reckless.

    • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      If LMG gave out a prototype for their latest screwdriver to be reviewed and it was onsold, I highly doubt it being called a “mistake” would have sufficed, heads would be rolling

      Feel terrible for Billet and how they were treated here

      • @legion02@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Ltt is certainly not innocent here but this one I’ll disagree with since it basically just happened to them with an early sample of the backpack.

      • @Contend6248@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Billet was treated very bad here and i’m not trying to defend anyone, but i didn’t saw the video and only heard from them because of this shitshow