• @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Wrong. Skin has FAR more crevices than gloves, has more bacteria naturally on it, and has literal body fluid coming off of it.

    If you think skin is as sanitary as gloves, you are a moron who knows nothing of basic germ theory or the foggiest idea of how gross biology is.

      • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You can cite “conventional wisdom” all you want.

        It will NEVER. EVER make skin less germ-prone than a fresh glove. Obstinance doesn’t make you right. It makes you a fool.

          • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            They are, in fact, NOT “as clean as each other”. That is stupid and what I said still directly refutes that stupid thought.

              • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Again, you are only demonstrating how withered and underdeveloped your idea of germ theory is…

                Do you think germs live well on a mostly sterile surface that contains no food or biological material? Or literally ON biological material?

                You’re not even making arguments about how the food itself can be contaminated, or that behavioral patterns can make the glove harder to notice when it gets dirty. No… they’re just equivalent… fucking pathetic thought process, there bud.

                  • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Cherry picking to sound smart. Besides, your hand is literally biology that can not only absorb chemicals, put puts off chemicals of its own. You’re just plain wrong, and your obstinance is pathetic.