• @z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1282 years ago

    Sure it’s his money but does anyone else feel legitimately frustrated at all the good that this money could have done?

    Rich dudes have always had vanity projects, but there is no grand concert hall or library or university to come out of this. Just a ruined company with millions of wasted hours of effort. For nothing.

    • @pgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      The nice thing about our economic system is that value is rarely completely destroyed, the money he paid for Twitter didn’t cease to exist, it went to former Twitter shareholders.

      They may be using it in more productive ways than he ever would.

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Consider whether Twitter was stifling some other growth. If you buy and burn down an advertising billboard, letting light into a market garden–perhaps that is beneficial.

        • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          232 years ago

          Just to add a little explanation to those who don’t get it: the man-hours spent by people working for then Twitter now X as well as resources used, uktimatelly for producing no wealth, could’ve instead been spent for something that did produce wealth.

          Same amount of input money either way, but one produces wealth (in the economic sense of the word rather than merelly monetary) and the other just wastes manpower and resources.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        312 years ago

        They may be using it in more productive ways than he ever would.

        They use it to reinvest and hoard. Because that’s what the investor class does, which is why they’re useless.

      • @MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Yeah. X makes various things named “Rockafeller” seem downright “not a dumpster fire” in contrast.

    • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Could have just bought land in Kentucky and sat on it. Made a nature preserve. Give the beavers and deer a place to chill for a century or more. Pretty lazy way to do charity but it still would have been better.

    • @Sarcastik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Hyperloop, boring tunnels, sending cars to space, etc

      Stop me when you’ve heard enough to believe this guy has obvious disdain for all of us.

      • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        It doesn’t work that way. Almost all of the money in the world is debt owed to someone else. Very few things are bought with cash. It is really credit on credit on credit on credit. And all of that depends on trust. My company gets product from your company today with the promise to pay in a month, your company does the same…

        When events like the Twitter buyout and burn happen it weakens trust. Which weakens credit. Which means the virtual money is gone.

    • mPony
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      millions of wasted hours of effort. For nothing.

      aah, Social Media in a nutshell.