• Beacon
        link
        fedilink
        415 days ago

        There’s no umlaut in english, so it doesn’t signify any sound in english words, it’s merely a stylistic choice, kind of like writing a z at the end of a word instead of an s.

        • @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          315 days ago

          I disagree though, when you adopt from other languages the sounds follow. Of course designers don’t feel like that, but they would be wrong.

          • Beacon
            link
            fedilink
            114 days ago

            I’m pretty sure that’s not actually how language works.

            • @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              That’s actually exactly how it works and how language evolves…foreign words are absorbed into a language, adding the new pronunciations to itself. There’s already a ton of English words that are either directly from foreign languages or heavily inspired by them, including their pronunciation and spelling.

              • Beacon
                link
                fedilink
                114 days ago

                But that’s not what we’re talking about. It’s extremely extremely rare for a language to adopt a new written character.

        • lurch (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          214 days ago

          there’s the alternate spelling of naïve and it’s derived words, but they are rarely used nowadays

      • @tacofox@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        314 days ago

        I could have gotten -100 votes on this and it would’ve been worth it for “deep hair gel lore” lmao