• Martin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12925 days ago

    Because reading a radio signal from the chip was too easy?

      • Martin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2925 days ago

        Yes, they are really cheap and the law (here in Sweden at least) requires all outdoor cats to be chipped. So the cat is probably already chipped anyway.

        • Even if for some reason you didn’t want to chip your cat (you should absolutely chip your cats and dogs) it would be trivial to just put a tiny receiver in something that dangles off their collar for the door to communicate with.

          • @Dust0741@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            223 days ago

            Why should you? As a non-cat owner, I am curious about the privacy implecations of it. Also the benefits.

            • @OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              You store your contact information on the chip. Then, if your pet gets out and someone finds it they can take it to the vet to have the chip read. Then they can contact you and give you your pet back.

              You could, of course, have your contact details on their collar. But collars can come off or break. And if you’re worried about privacy, literally anyone can just read the tag on your pet’s collar. Most people aren’t going to have the equipment on hand to read a chip.

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2125 days ago

        Chips are implants that go under the skin. Most civilized places require pets to have them in urban places.

        • @Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          1125 days ago

          Ah gotcha, they are chipped in that way, I didn’t realize you could just use that though for this type of situation. I definitely thought of the chips in the collars lol.