• @lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    83 months ago

    Kind of a great ad:

    This bra will survive a nuclear blast and outlive you and your loved ones!

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    323 months ago

    Can anyone with actual knowledge confirm if that’s a pelvis capable of squeezing out babies? Or did they pay boobs on a male skeleton?

    • WillStealYourUsernameOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      523 months ago

      Skeletons can’t be infallibly sexed because sexual characteristics aren’t binary, including the shape of the skeleton. They are usually gendered using multiple clues

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        183 months ago

        I just sort of expected all demonstration skeletons to be super typically male, because some male with a tophat as big as his sexism came up with it in the 1800s. Generally, my pessimistic assumptions about this end up true.

        But yeah, I realize in my pessimism I overshot into the wrong direction.

        • @python@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Dang you just unlocked a confusing memory.

          My secondary school had a demonstration skeleton, but it was the skeleton of a real person who donated their body to science.
          The teachers had given them a male name, despite the skeleton being female. Apparently kids just expected skeletons to be male for some reason, and explaining the difference every time was annoying to teachers.

          I didn’t have the brain capacity to realize that it might have been kinda messed up towards the real person that skeleton belonged to, but now that I think back on it… yeah, there’s problems with that.

      • @gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 months ago

        Incorrect.

        I’ve sexed so many skeletons over the years and it’s never felt wrong before. 😏

        • WillStealYourUsernameOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          in one instance, sure? that can’t be generalized to all populations, nor does it account for intersex individuals

          https://forensicsdigest.com/scope-of-forensic-anthropology-estimation-of-gender-from-human-skeletal-remains/

          Edit: This one is way more relevant https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2015/908535

          Edit: The context here is a stupid gotcha by transphobes, and how it isn’t even correct. Keep in mind in the future when they find our bones that our current society is very mobile and global. I don’t exactly live in the same place as the rest of my family, so they will only have random assorted skeletons from people from lots of different places to compare to and will therefore have reduced accuracy when guessing my natal sex.

          • @Reyali@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Wow, thanks for sharing. I was definitely under the impression that skeletons could be identified with at least a reasonable amount of certainty. (Though maybe what I thought I knew was that women who had children could be identified?)

            Either way, I appreciate the links!

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    343 months ago

    lol there’s no nipples, that’s an ad for a bra.

    “Our line of bras are so comfortable and durable that you’ll still be getting all the support you need with them even in the afterlife!”

      • don
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        It’s a strapless bra with the ribcage supporting the boobies. Otherwise you’d have a bone bra clacking against the ribcage, and we can’t have that.

  • @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    As someone who likes to see the good in the world, I’d say: “checkmate, transphobes, who claim that archaeologists won’t be able to identify my gender via skeleton”.

    • riwo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      163 months ago

      isnt it the transphobes who say that archeologists will (incorrectly) assume your gender based on your skeleton?

      • @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        133 months ago

        Yeah, I assumed that the bone-boobs were included in gender-affirming surgery.

        Sorry, if my joke wasn’t as thought through as it should have been. Hadn’t had lunch back then. 😅

    • @Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      353 months ago

      Transphobes: This is totally new, people made it up a few years ago.

      Also transphobes: If ancient people were like this there’s no way we could tell.

    • @TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      There was actually a thing where out of like 27 skeletons randomly selected for a study, only TWO were confirmed to be female & male respectively. There were like 10 total that were thought to be male & female but the other ~15 they had no idea!
      https://youtu.be/Vqzbkc-03Tg @ 21 minutes

  • irelephant [he/him]🍭
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Wait, if someone has breast implants and their body decomposes, what happens to the implants? do they just say on top of the skeleton like jellyfish or something?