• @sndrtj@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    When the US does it it’s just established practise. When a non-US entity does the same thing, it’s suddenly a matter of national security.

    The anti-Chinese vibe in the US right now is rather absurd. The rise of China should have been viewed as an opportunity, not a threat.

    • @9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      When you see the amount of patriotism people seem to get flooded in from an early age, it’s kinda understandable the blindness a lot of Americans have to how shitty their country has gotten.

      On the flip side, China definitely has its own problems, particularly with such an authoritarian government currently.

  • P03 Locke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Too late… China already installed the foreign spying features first.

  • @asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Many of the concessions the government asked of TikTok look eerily similar to the surveillance tactics critics have accused Chinese officials of abusing. To allay fears the short-form video app could be used as a Chinese surveillance tool, the federal government nearly transformed it into an American one instead.

    lul The real motivation

  • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    The draft document, which Gizmodo could not independently verify, 

    So they have no idea what is or isn’t actually in this agreement, but sounds like they’ve asked for data access and audit capabilities to ensure US user data is separated and not sent where it shouldn’t be.

    This honestly seems reasonable. It’s a foreign app from a country that has banned every American tech app, data is only flowing one way and that’s concerning.

    But honestly without knowing what’s actually in there this article is pretty pointless. Just more unverified fearmongering clickbait.

  • flipht
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    File it under “no shit” and “stuff that was called from the beginning but now we’ll all act surprised.”

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    So instead of doing their job and preventing US citizens to be spied on by foreign governments, they just want a piece of the cake and spy on them and others, too!

  • @betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    “Let us see the data and analysis products you’re gathering on our citizens to send home to the CCP”

    “How dare you ask us for such an invasion of their privacy!”

    • Nix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They forcefully got tons of data from google, microsoft etc on US citizens. Why would they be doing it for “good” now? Just because “CCP bad”?

      Instead Apple and hardware manufacturers in general should prevent their products from allowing any software company from invading the people’s privacy in such intense ways.

      • @RobotToaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Instead Apple and hardware manufacturers in general should prevent their products from allowing any software company from invading the people’s privacy in such intense ways.

        lol, every intel processor has a backdoor called the intel management engine, it’s literally a second processor running minix.

      • @betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        This article and the one it links to from Forbes describe arrangements to access the data that is being collected through the app but I believe the Gizmodo headline is misrepresenting that as a request for additional invasive features. My comment is meant to point out how I perceive the drafted agreement and the pearl-clutching response from that headline.

        I don’t think they want that information purely in the service of Truth, Justice and the American Way™ but concerns about what the CCP has access to through their app are legitimate. Privacy invasion is unacceptable no matter who is doing it. There are cases where it is necessary but even then, it should be limited and subject to intense scrutiny to protect the rights of individuals. The Patriot act and things like it are an absolute disaster on that front, for example, but that’s no excuse for feeding our information directly to a hostile foreign power.

        I’d love to see hardware and software producers (as well as legislators) putting user privacy higher on their list of priorities. It’s a huge problem that we’re still coming to grips with and the people making the rules are generally woefully ignorant of the technology in use.

  • Amphobet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    How unsurprising. There will be no consequences for the federal government, even if this information should become common knowledge.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Whoever is responsible for making it common knowledge will be hated by the people and branded a traitor. We’ve already seen this story play out before.

  • @silvercove@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    This is why the US Government wants to ban Tiktok. It’s very easy for them to force Google, Apple, Microsoft or Twitter to spy on people. It’s much harder with a Chinese company that is headquartered overseas.

  • @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It sounds like those same “spying features” — e.g. examining server logs — would also be useful as *counter-*spying features, to verify that TikTok is not being used as a weapon by the genocidal regime currently in power in China.

    Given that the genocidal regime has engaged in illegal harassment, assault, and espionage against people of Chinese ethnicity residing in the US, Canada, and other nations, that seems like a pretty good idea, really! The US government has a legitimate interest in protecting its citizens of Chinese descent from lawless abuse by a foreign power.

    • @silvercove@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      and Iraq had WMDs, right? right?

      It amazes me how you keep believing the lies of the US government.

              • @fubo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                If you’re looking for an American genocide, the Middle East is the wrong place to look. You want the Native Americans.

                “Genocide” means something, and “stupid fucking idiotic war” isn’t it.

                It’s not illegal to discuss the crimes of the US government in the US. It is illegal to discuss the crimes of the China government in China, by the way.

                • On
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  “It’s not that bad because it wasn’t an actual genocide. we already have genocide under our belt.”

                  geez. how many war criminals were put to justice during that “stupid fucking idiotic war”?

                  It’s not illegal to discuss the crimes of the US government in the US

                  discussing does fuck all when you have laws to prevent any justice being served for the crimes you commit abroad and sanctions the people investigating it.

                  https://www.hrw.org/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-becomes-law

                  https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/12/14/us-sanctions-international-criminal-court

                  and Fuck China too. There aren’t just tankies and yankies on the internet. We can be critical of both of you.

                • @silvercove@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  And what has that discussion produced? Has the American murderers stopped killing people? They let you discuss, because nothing will come out of it. You have no influence to change policy.

    • @Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      Oh fuck off. They wanted it to spy on their own citizens and those of its allied nations. They wanted the same backdoor google, Facebook, Microsoft and all our telecom companies give them.

      I’ve seen a lot of bad takes but this takes the cake. There isn’t anything virtuous about mass spy programs and no way was any actual chinese data even on the table.

      • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        They wanted the same backdoor google, Facebook, Microsoft and all our telecom companies give them.

        None of those companies give “backdoor access”. All information has to be obtained legally via a warrant. Why do you think they’re all throwing E2E encryption in their apps? Nobody wants to work with the government here, it’s bad for business.

        • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I suggest you read all about FISA courts.

          They issue court orders which companies cannot divulge they’re under and those things are often not limited to surveillance of specific individuals in the course of investigating a crime but are often mass surveillance orders.

          This is how the NSA had servers directly in some US phone providers feeding directly from their core systems.

          All this was brought out as part of the Snowden revelations, so you should know better than parrot the description of what has been a fantasy version of how the Law works in the US since 9/11 and the Patriot Act.

          Still today it’s a core rule for companies anywhere in the World which have trade secrets that might be of benefit to US companies to not use any systems hosted or owned by US companies (or, in fact, UK ones, were such laws are even worse) exactly because said US companies can silently be complied BY LAW to give the local spy agencies access to that data.

    • 1bluepixel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      402 years ago

      Oh yeah. Let’s completely surrender our right to privacy because China bad. Surely the American government only has the well-being of its citizens in mind.

    • kadu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      So… the US government, the one we actually know with hard evidence uses every local company to collect massive amounts of user data and spy on them - from Facebook to Microsoft to Intel to basically any tech company, with backdoors engineered in under threat, is now being caught trying to do the same with TikTok and you blame… China? Somehow China is the one spying and this is all the US defending itself?

      Jesus, I couldn’t write a more ridiculous parody of a patriot if I tried to.

    • Melpomene
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      While I admire your optimism, the fact that US intelligence agencies have been caught -repeatedly- violating citizens’ privacy under cover of covert programs… I can only asssume this was more of the same.

    • @RobotToaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Given that the genocidal regime has engaged in illegal harassment, assault, and espionage

      Yes, but enough about the US regime.