SigmarStern

Thanks for that rabbit hole. My former colleagues and I have just started a new conversation thread in our WhatsApp group about the differences of (non-) cryptographic hashes and encryption. And all because I was confused why you’ve chosen to reference the public key file in your original comment. Well, at least I’m learning something.

Sorry for the confusion about “encryption”. I meant “signing” which is encrypting a hash of the commit with your private key, so that others can verify that your the author of the commit using your public key and the hash.

I think, the only confusion here was the original comment that referenced the public key for signing, but this was resolved, as it is just telling git which key pair to use. Probably, all people here understand the basics of asymmetrical encryption and signing and it was merely misunderstanding of how the command for signing git commits can be used.

OH! Now I see! Thanks for pointing that out.

Yeah, sorry, I meant signing, not encrypting. I know about asymmetrical encryption. That’s why I was confused by the original statement. For signing you use your private key so that others can verify your identity by using your public key for checking the signature. For encrypting data you use the public key of the receiver.

The original comment used the public key for signing, which is not what you want to do. I now read the explanation.

But why? Public is public. People can take my public key. The can encrypt my commit, making it indistinguishable from my commit.

Isn’t the idea to use your private key for encryption so that everyone can use your public key to decrypt your signature and to verify that it’s you who actually did the commit, because no one else has access to the private key?

Are you using your public ssh key for signing? Wouldn’t it make more sense to use the private one as people can then verify your identity by using your public key?

You would need to buy the chicken from somewhere. You would only buy the female chicken, because you want the eggs. There would still be male chickens that no one wants, except for reproduction. That would at least be my logic so I’d say no.

Oh yeah, I remember the good ol’ “Our whole business Logic is within this 30 tables spread sheet, that only one person can read, and don’t you dare restarting that computer” times.

One person. Sitting in front of three monitors. In front of a spreadsheet that maxed out every resource of that computer. It was glorious.

No porn: https://m.soundcloud.com/bruh-bruh-629710116/iris-phoebe-bridgers-and-maggie-rogers

Online vegan here. Just wanted to add that after a couple of years of the same jokes and arguments and demeaning comments that were forced upon you because you had to explain why you don’t want to eat what everyone else around you eats, you kinda lose your tact a bit.

Never went to somebody with a burger in hand and called him a murderer. Been called an emasculated pussy and wittle little rabbit for eating a salad so many times. Same people then complain about annoying vegans. It’s a bit infuriating.